• JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A good opportunity to remind everyone that a vastly superior alternative to Organic Maps already exists: Osmand.

        • MaxMalRichtig@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think this is true in that sense. You can get the full experience for free by - either building it your self - or simply on FDroid. If you still use Gruesome Playstore, then yes, it is “soft paywalled”.

          Or do you mean other features that are not even in the FDroid build? (Which could be some proprietary features.)

          • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You can get the full experience for free by - either building it your self - or simply on FDroid.

            I doubt they gift you accumulated hundreds of dollars yearly worth of premium features plus all the stuff hidden behind the paywall just because you didn’t load from the Google Play Store.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would disagree. I have both and use each for different tasks.

      OSMAnd is clunky and unintuitive. I have learned it well and have it setup for land navigation type stuff. It’s incredibly good at displaying every last detail of the topography.

      Organic Maps is fantastic for city navigation. It’s smooth and quick and ever since the addition of turn-by-turn voice navigation I’m in love. I use the Sherpa Onnx voices and they sound so lifelike.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Interesting perspective. I too have used Osmand (or “OsmAnd” or “OSMAnd” or whatever unpronounceable official name it is) for years. 13 years to be precisely, without a break. I’ve contributed numerous bug reports and feature requests. It’s clunky and unintuitive yes, but I’ve seen worse in other power apps of this kind.

        But Osmand is still lacking a couple of features on my personal wishlist, so I naturally gave Organic Maps a decent audition, navigation included. I found that it did only one thing better: rendering of subway lines in dense cities. But this has now been largely fixed by a new setting in Osmand (cleverly hidden, obviously). In everything else, OM just felt to me like a poor man’s alternative to Osmand. With a busy hive of developers earnestly working towards feature parity sometime in the next millennium.

        These two projects have the exactly the same objectives. I continue to wish the OM developers would just put aside their egos and help fix whatever it is they don’t like in Osmand. That’s the point of FOSS.

    • Pleat1752@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Organic Maps is better for “normal” users if you ask me. Osmand is better for pro users but quite clunky.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, Osmand is definitely clunky by comparison. But the UX is getting slowly more intuitive. I see no reason why Osmand’s easy-peasy defaults mode cannot end up equal to to OM. They’re not far off, and at point its superiority would be clear as day.

        Personally I wish the OM devs could have contributed their talents to making Osmand better. Really feels like wasteful duplication which benefits nobody benefits except the egos of a handful of developers. A common problem with FOSS and this is a great example IMO.

  • Vincent@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Man, so much attempt to stir up drama. Can they just talk about why they initially added the MIT license if they didn’t intend to make it public, why they didn’t make it public and open source, and what needs to happen to do that in a way and at a time that everyone is happy with, without having to do so with the eyes of the internet on them?