• joshchandra@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Kdenlive is an old piece of software from over a decade ago. While we can’t be sure that all of the contributors stayed AI-free, I’m sure all of the code was vetted for quality since a lot of people are invested in this incredible video editor.

      Even from an anti-AI view, I’m not sure of what to make of skepticism like yours; what if vibe coders simply lie and say they didn’t use AI? Then would you instantly give it a pass? Proof of AI-free work has become impossible due to offline FOSS models, so unless I’m missing something, all we can do is aim for quality and security by this point, I think.

      • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I’ve heard of many projects disabling contributions, shutting down, or pivoting to closed source and naming slop code as a major reason.

        If the contributions are quality, that’s great, but I don’t think skepticism is an inappropriate reaction to a sudden surge in contributions in this year of all years.

        • joshchandra@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Really? What software went from open-source to closed specifically because of vibe-coding? I’d also question how long they kept up their quality… What apps disabled contributions in favor of AI slop? I’ve never heard of this.

          Stirling-PDF and Episteme Reader are solid examples of apps that went freemium, but I know of no product that entirely went paid-only because of vibe-coding. If anything, Stirling-PDF was originally vibe-coded and then added traditional programmers to its team upon seeing its popularity skyrocket, from what I remember reading. I’d be curious to see your examples on the other end.