• texture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    yeah thats why i said “id just assume” not “i think”

    also, youre really mixing up provocative with patriarchal and thats unfortunate.

    anyway, simple misunderstanding. cheers

    edit - my issue isnt with the decision or the details as they are given, its of this being a post in a sub i love. i’ll edit my comment to say “id have just”

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “I’d just assume” unprompted is functionally the same as “I think”; nobody first asked you “well if you had to assume, what would’ve happened?” We’re all adults here; we all understand what words mean.

      And I used “provocative” because you’re directly implying a form of patriarchical censorship for inherently one of two reasons or some combination: the patriarchical system 1) thinks it’s too provocative or 2) thinks it’s too superfluous, and (2) isn’t per se patriarchy; reasonable minds can differ on whether the scene merited inclusion. I’m sure it wasn’t like that scene from The Room where they make a big deal out of Mark’s clean-shaven face; I’m sure the protein filaments growing out of Robbie’s armpits weren’t the nominal objective of the scene. Thus I assumed you were referring to the only one that’s strictly, inherently patriarchical for which there wouldn’t be a more plausible explanation.