• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I think the extremes on either side of this are nuts. Specifically:

    • Linux purists demanding a native executable.

    • Windows purists… just being difficult, I guess?

    Official Proton support is an excellent, functional compromise. It’s extremely usable, and extremely practical for devs to maintain within their existing environment.

    • woelkchen@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s usable until it isn’t. That’s the problem with Wine/Proton. It’s not a stable implementation of a well defined specification like Java. It’s a reimplementation via reverse engineering of proprietary Win32, something that’s buggy and sometimes changed between Windows updates by accident.

      Update to a game compiled with a slightly newer version of Visual Studio, like it’s happening all the time with live service games? Compatibility becomes a dice roll. Sure, the chance is high that compatibility is kept but it not 100%. Neither is Proton not breaking a game by accident. The big games are automatically checked by Valve but some weird indie game isn’t.

      And here comes the wonderful thing that’s Steam Linux Runtime: containerized binary compatible runtimes of every other or so Debian release. All the issues about not being able to target Linux because of its ever changing nature have been fixed by Valve and yet for whatever reason Valve refuses to promote it towards developers.

      They literally promote Win32+x86 emulation for Steam Frame development, a wearable platform where even the slightest stuttering can cause motion sickness and where battery optimization is paramount.

      I hope Valve bring Lepton, their Android compatibility layer, to x86 Linux as well. Lepton is based directly on AOSP and not reverse engineering. I have higher hope for that.

      • BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I would argue the difference is that they claim that it’s officially supported through Proton, meaning they’re likely to put effort into ensuring it continues to function through proton.

  • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Man the anti Linux users in the discussion are so weird. Like why simp for windows? are they upset the couldn’t get Linux running on their desktop?

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Maybe they think it will facilitate hacking?

      Or maybe split development resources?

      I’m not saying that’s true or even a rational argument, just trying to play devil’s advocate.

  • ScottyTheEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Glad to see they’re officially supporting linux as an option. Looks like my kind of FPS, especially love the part of the trailer where they explicitly say they AREN’T a battle royale XD.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They have to. Milsim players have a big linux playerbase.

        • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Honestly that is the kinda area that interests me. So far the main FPS games I like are the WW1 games like Isonzo and Enlisted in low rank games only - because high rank gives every rifleman a machine gun.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It looks like squad(which is the halfway between arma and BF) without the suppression mechanic.

  • chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I keep seeing this game pop up, is this the new hot shit or just a flash in the pan streamer thing, I would love more old school battlefield shenanigans

    • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I bought it for the Linux support as I like battlefield so I’ll let you know as a non streamer after the weekend.

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Sounds kinda interesting. Fairly high system requirements but at least they do specify that gets you 60FPS.

    Would probably wait for ProtonDB to fill out reports first.

  • ルルㇲ@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Lossy needs to learn to write precisely:
    ⇒We only support the Proton emulation that may work in Linux.

    Support for actual Linux has to include at the least an .ELF.