MTZ@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoTBH it's a really good deal.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1213
arrow-up1213imageTBH it's a really good deal.lemmy.worldMTZ@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareMeatPilot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up23·edit-22 days agoThey have to prepare it rather than just rinse them and throw them in a pot whole. I prefer the head on, adds more flavor. Also kind of like a crawdad it’s easier to peel with it’s head attached. Pinch, twist, pull.
minus-squarered_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 hours agoYou, of course, gave the sensible answer. But just in case anyone missed the joke, “head” was implied here to mean “giving head”, aka fellatio being included in the cheaper option.
minus-squaredumbass@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 day agoWhat fucking blowjobs are you getting?
minus-squareccunning@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·2 days agoI think it was a joke. Also, it’s because it takes more shrimp to make a pound of headless shrimp than head-on shrimp.
minus-squareMeatPilot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 days agoBoth correct, sorry I’m an idiot.
They have to prepare it rather than just rinse them and throw them in a pot whole.
I prefer the head on, adds more flavor. Also kind of like a crawdad it’s easier to peel with it’s head attached. Pinch, twist, pull.
You, of course, gave the sensible answer. But just in case anyone missed the joke, “head” was implied here to mean “giving head”, aka fellatio being included in the cheaper option.
What fucking blowjobs are you getting?
I think it was a joke.
Also, it’s because it takes more shrimp to make a pound of headless shrimp than head-on shrimp.
Both correct, sorry I’m an idiot.