• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The author said, “maybe it’s different inside”. My restating the author is not an accusation that you wrote the article.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t understand context even. Sheesh. This is what I mean by you having a shit reading level.

      Yes, it is.

      I arguing that you didn’t understand the article. Then you reply to that by disagreeing with the thing you misunderstood.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          My argument is that you misunderstood, because of your reading capabilities. For anyone with proper reading comprehension, that’s kinda evident from reading this thread.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You have been arguing by trying to have it both ways.

            You claim the author gave a suggestion of what is inside black holes. I asserted that the suggestion doesn’t meet the criteria of a suggestion for a scientific article and therefore isn’t a suggestion.

            You then respond with the equivalent of, “I’m not the author and not defending the content.”

            This is Space, not Astrology. The criteria for article content is higher.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You claim the author gave a suggestion of what is inside black holes.

              It very clearly does.

              If you can’t see that you’re illiterate.

              Then you get mad at me pointing that out and start crying for apologies online. Fucking lol

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Back to commenting on the content, despite me not at any point talking about it with you. I merely pointed out you read it poorly — which you did. Now stop crying over it and just leave rhe thread alone if you’re so ashamed.

                  “apologise to meeeee REEEEEEEE

                  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Back to commenting on the content,

                    You just commented on the content. You can’t have it both ways.

                    You comment on the content by claiming he gave a suggestion.