• GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I can only say “good luck”. It is not an easy distro. Though if the apps you use are available as flatpaks, you may be fine.

          • Bitterhalt@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I think Void is much easier to maintain than Arch. And I was on Arch for 4 years. Runit is super simple too.

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Installation is pretty easy if you choose the Xfce version. The system is stable but many things in it (such as the init system) are unpopular which makes the learning curve very steep. The repo doesn’t have that many packages so you have to rely on Flatpak (or Snap but idk if it works on Void) for software support. Hardware support and drivers may be an issue because of that as well.

            • JetpackJackson@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ah ok gotcha. My plan was to try dual booting so i still have a working arch system in case something doesn’t work. Thanks for the tips!

              • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I love Void, but the small repo did make me change to Artix with Runit.

                Honestly, Void is pretty straightforward, great distro.

    • Bitterhalt@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Void has been great. I was using Arch for the last 3-4 years, then I tried Void just out of boredom and found myself liking it so much that I left it as a daily driver.

  • houseofleft@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Never heard of river but looks really cool! Come to think of it, I haven’t heard or a bunch of this stuff- yazi looks really neat

    • bthalt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It is very solid WM. If you have used dwm before, you feel like home. Yazi is like modernized lf/ranger clone written in Rust, it is very fast and comes with sane defaults.

      • houseofleft@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yazi sounds ideal! Does river involve as much set up as dwm? I really love the ideas behind suckless tools but they normally involve a lot or set up to configure hoe I like.

        • bthalt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          No, River is more like i3, Sway and bspwm, really simple and does not Require coding skills. Config is a shell script but it is really simple.