onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours agoEnglish Wikipedia bans archive.todayen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1190
arrow-up1190external-linkEnglish Wikipedia bans archive.todayen.wikipedia.orgonehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareactionjbone@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·8 hours agoNo. They think that relying on a hostile archive will ultimately harm Wikipedia. They know the shortcomings of the other options.
minus-squareikt@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoi’ve not used the others are they not as good? i’ll be trying them soon
minus-squareactionjbone@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 hours agoIt’s not that aren’t as good necessarily. More that the others do less “grey-hat” stuff, and therefore are less likely to cause harm or alter the content they host.
No.
They think that relying on a hostile archive will ultimately harm Wikipedia.
They know the shortcomings of the other options.
i’ve not used the others are they not as good?
i’ll be trying them soon
It’s not that aren’t as good necessarily.
More that the others do less “grey-hat” stuff, and therefore are less likely to cause harm or alter the content they host.