Out of all the feasible outcomes from today’s point of view, Pahlavi might be the least bad one, which is why I don’t think its going to happen.
More feasible seems to be a situation in which the IRGC&co continue with their occupation of the country and USA/Israel strike some kind of deal with a new ayatollah (which for now seems to be the old one’s son, go figure). Either that or the conflict continues for X time and it gradually simmers down, no deal struck.
Very unfortunate reality for Iranians, I’m afraid.Son of mass murder sjah ,new president of Iran ? Are you nuts ?
7 seconds into the article:
It features seven people, among them lawyer and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi and leaders of other parties and organisations opposing the Islamic Republic of Iran, such as the 7 Aban Front, the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan, and the communist Tudeh Party.
Its to the people of Iran to deside, not the puppets from murica of europe
Is he the son of the Iranian slaughterer or a European puppet? Pick a lane.
I think ,… both
That is also mentioned in the article about 12 seconds in:
politicians in Brussels recognising that it is Iranians who should choose their new leaders, and not the European Union’s job to endorse specific contenders.
Seriuse question, do you always read all articles with a stopwatch next to you, you are the first person I meet now who does this, reason?
It’s just to illustrate how little effort it takes to actually read the thing instead of reacting to the headline with points the article already addresses.
Point taken
Out with the old, in with the … older?