Nah, can’t have been too important.

What?

I don’t agree with that at all, if you don’t or can’t understand the terms of a contract, you sign at your own peril, expecting the government to step in everytime a person decides to excercise their stupidity is authoritarian and leads to a bloated, innefficient system. This thinking just makes contracts meaningless, it just means you can claim ignorance everytime you sign into a contract you don’t like.

Regulating food is whole different game for a number of reasons, i dont think it’s a reasonable comparison.

Blame the person you are related to. Duh.

A rape victim didn’t sign a contract saying that would happen if they went dont that alley. That’s the difference.

There is no bad guy in this case, just an idiot and a company.

New Zealand understands this, you can sign away a companies liability to yourself. For adventure tourism stuff mostly. It’s a good and fair way to do things I think.

Who should be responsible for these people agreeing to a contract and then not wanting to honour the contracts terms?

If personal responsibilty is “a whacked out take” then I’ll take that.

No one has any right to complain, this possibility is clearly outlined in the t&c’s every person agreed to.

Shouldn’t have handed out your defining essence to a corporation.

“I’m brand new to Linux, so I went straight to Arch.”