This. Pretty sad that people in my country (UK) might have to use technology designed to help people in repressive regimes for basic access to perfectly legal and moral information whilst preserving the dignity of privacy, but here we are.
Datacentre-hosted LLM’s have a long way to go to be accurate enough for mass deployment. It looks to me like it will take a miracle of some sort for them to manage it before this bubble pops. It could be decades or more, after all we don’t have a real understanding of how the brain works, so hoping to mimic it now seems a bit premature.
I can see RAG and fine tuning making an LLM accurate enough to be functional, enough for a range of natural language processing computing tasks (with a decent amount of human input that ultimately is used for fine-tuning). But even if just for cost reasons (in RAG’s case), you will surely want your LLM hosted locally. I don’t see a need for that data centre.
Venture capitalists/silicone valley bros might have burned through trillions to do the work to get trained LLM’s useful enough for people to run in their own organisations/at home.
Criminals like privacy, too.
This is moronic.
All apples are fruit therefore all fruit are apples.
Graphene OS is not for criminals. It is just basic privacy protection.
This cunt must be some sort of shill or plant for government or surveillance capitalists.
Arch really isn’t very difficult to use these days for someone with a few years debian or similar use (don’t try and use it when first trying linux).
Installing it is straightforward (albeit in a linux rather than, say, windows installation sense), and you can access preferences via the settings app.