

I just don’t understand. Where are they going to farm more money and labor if their constituents die?


I just don’t understand. Where are they going to farm more money and labor if their constituents die?


Yeah I just saw a press conference where they said best case scenario is that it ruptures and leaks out.
That begs the question as to why there aren’t multiple ways to release tank pressure.


I feel like nuclear programs plan better than this so I expect more of anyone storing a chemical like methyl methacrylate that has a similar thermal runaway risk.
In a normal society, I would expect whoever is storing this is held accountable so that other companies storing it take the proper measures to prevent something like this from happening in the future. Unfortunately we don’t live in that society :(


As an outsider that knows nothing, it sounds crazy to me that anything this toxic could be contained in a system that fails to a level of two options: uncontrollable leak or explosion.
Is this the norm or is this a larger safety design failure?


Depends on context really. If you’re looking for a hosted solution similar to Github, Gitlab is much more expensive. Our team was on a self-hosted version of Gitlab but needed more change control around PR reviews and merging. We moved to Github and got that for $4 per user per month where that same functionality would’ve cost ~$30 per user per month on Gitlab. That’s a crazy price difference and was easily worth the migration to Github for our use case.
I accidentally used it the other day and was surprised at how useful it was.


ah okay, didn’t realize that. Sounds like mullvad just isn’t a good fit for my use case.


It’s probably been a year or so since I’ve given Mullvad another try, so maybe it’s time I do that soon.


I really wish I could use them but it never works with my streaming services. I’ve had to stick to Proton or NordVPN for reliable streaming :(


Yeah, I would love to be able to setup something in Apple Music that would load in the NPR news breaks that happen regularly throughout the day into my music playlists.


Kids can’t actually get access to the internet on their own. You have to purchase an internet connection of some sort via a provider and kids can’t do that. Public access, like libraries, would have to use ID/age verification in person, sure. But not the general internet. That responsibility falls to the parents of the children and you can create whatever punitive laws you want to punish and hold parents accountable for preventing their kids from accessing the internet.
It’s literally the same thing we do with prescription drugs and alcohol. Some people have to lock them up, but mostly those bottles are unlocked and accessible to kids all over the world and we expect the parents to do the gatekeeping and then punish/hold the parents accountable when they don’t.


The parents have the responsibility of enforcing it and that’s it, that’s enough.
If you want to add laws to say that parents that fail to keep their kids off the internet can lose their kids, fine idgaf. Create whatever you want to hold parents accountable but as parents, this is THEIR problem.


I’m sick of this. If it’s that big of a deal, we just need to ban kids from the internet. Full stop. No intermediary measure will be good enough.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to just have geo-based communities for that? Like ‘australian-politics’ or ‘seattle-news’? The functionality is already there it just isn’t being used.