ruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comexternal-linkmessage-square120fedilinkarrow-up1149
arrow-up1149external-linkWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square120fedilink
minus-squareRobbo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 days agoapp images need to not be called app images. first time seeing it it sounds like some macos thing. but even still I don’t see why they get compared so much to flatpak and snap when they are completely different.
minus-squareSamskara@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoThey serve the same purpose: Install software, that’s not in your distro‘s repository.
app images need to not be called app images. first time seeing it it sounds like some macos thing. but even still I don’t see why they get compared so much to flatpak and snap when they are completely different.
They serve the same purpose: Install software, that’s not in your distro‘s repository.