Ourst@lemmy.sdf.org to Memes of Production@quokk.auEnglish · 3 days agoChina's Marxist-Leninist Stock Exchangelemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1358
arrow-up1358imageChina's Marxist-Leninist Stock Exchangelemmy.sdf.orgOurst@lemmy.sdf.org to Memes of Production@quokk.auEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-squareSl00k@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days ago The majority of traders on U.S. stock exchanges (95%+) are individual traders. Absolutely need a source for that one. Sounds wrong on both volume of $ and volume of trades.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThat’s because “[number of] traders” and “volume” are two different numbers. Volume wise it’s probably the opposite.
minus-squareSl00k@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoYes but using number of traders is useless to look at which is why I used total volume or amount of trades both of which sounds wrong from Ops claim. Number traders does sound accurate but it’s a worthless metric that doesn’t tell us anything because they aren’t the ones doing the trading.
Absolutely need a source for that one. Sounds wrong on both volume of $ and volume of trades.
That’s because “[number of] traders” and “volume” are two different numbers. Volume wise it’s probably the opposite.
Yes but using number of traders is useless to look at which is why I used total volume or amount of trades both of which sounds wrong from Ops claim.
Number traders does sound accurate but it’s a worthless metric that doesn’t tell us anything because they aren’t the ones doing the trading.
Yes