DLSS 5 is on track for a Fall 2026 debut and replaces a game’s original textures with AI-inflused versions to make them hyperreal. Or, out of one uncanny valley and into another!

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Yep, got it to work (hardest part was the cropping): https://streamable.com/j0ryqe

    Your images are coming from different frames. If you go to the YouTube link, you can see where they were copied from and how the idle animation distorts them. Unfortunately, they’ve only included the intro clip to the video as a side by side of the same frame. Here is your example, zoomed out - it was never going to match: https://imgur.com/a/vRu1Xxa

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Your images are coming from different frames

      I mean, they’re the images that Nvidia chose to present as the comparison, but watching the video I do not see her eyes and lips growing like that in the idle animation

      https://imgur.com/a/vRu1Xxa

      Imgur isn’t available in the UK, I’m afraid

      https://streamable.com/j0ryqe

      With all due respect, I don’t think this shows what you think it shows. Here is that exact video downloaded, zoomed in, and brightened to clarify it: https://streamable.com/hpxx37

      • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        That’s ok, I can paste what you were trying to compare here:

        I’m not seeing the relevance of your new video. This filter manipulates brightness and material at a pixel level, which my video shows at several. At the level of focus you are trying to show, there are still material differences being applied, like how light bounces of off the skin, eye, and lips, and the filter is working over detail that I already warned you the only frames that could be compared against each other are lacking.

        My video already shows it applying well enough, but if try to zoom up to the pixels in an image that does not have the quality to show what it’s parting from and ignore what’s happening on the quality that can be made it, it certainly can be argued into a different story.

        I think my example already does a decent job at showing that this isn’t just the typical image generation AI, so I’m afraid we’ll have to disagree from here on out, as I don’t think either can make the example to each other any more clearer. Regardless, if you are as interested as I am on this, it will be something true experts go over and point out when it gets released.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          That’s ok, I can paste what you were trying to compare here

          Are you trying to say that the because the frames have differently-shaped facial features, my argument that the filter changed the shapes of facial features is wrong? If not, what are you saying?

          I’m not seeing the relevance of your new video.

          To show that even at the lower resolution, the eyes and lips are still changing shape

          I’m not talking about texturing details or lighting. I’m talking about her eyes and lips being different shapes and sizes.

          • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            It’s been nice so far, thanks for the examples and the conversation. I don’t think there’s much more to add. Even though you want to keep discussing it, I feel like I’d be repeating myself just to reach an impasse. Have a good day!