• pewpew@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah sure it looks more “real” but you are losing so much expression and you are making the image look like it was badly photoshopped.

      I think half of their comparison screenshots look flatout worse with DLSS 5

      • StellarSt0rm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Yeah i was thinking that, using the comparison tool i was able to see it better and it completely ruined the atmosphere in the first image. The image without DLSS5 looks darker and personally i think it looks better like that, DLSS5 then just completely removes that darkness and makes it look awful.

        Also, as someone who is making a game in godot, lighting is EVERYTHING, i am spending hours tweaking my lights so they look good.

    • idealotus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ehhhh. I saw the text (“The Real Deal” poster on the window in one comparison). There’s still some artifacting, which to me is a deal breaker, especially if I have to DLSS everything instead of selected items.

      But I’m also not a game developer, so I don’t know if the modeling differences are worth the tradeoff for something that most people won’t see in motion.