“Well, first of all, they’re completely wrong,” Huang said in response to a question from Tom’s Hardware editor-in-chief Paul Alcorn about the criticism.

“The reason for that is because, as I have explained very carefully, DLSS 5 fuses controllability of the of geometry and textures and everything about the game with generative AI,” Huang continued.

Just a elongated way to say AI slop.

  • Xopher@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s one thing to defend AI slop; but my god, why does his answer sound like AI slop?

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      These people are likely conversing with AI daily… If you talk to AI a lot… It’ll rub off on you. At least that’s my guess from a neuroscience perspective. It’s like the hive mind effect, basically.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      AI just regurgitates what it’s trained on.

      Where do you think it comes from? Who do you think is the ceo grand captain of that shitship?

      • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 minutes ago

        That’s Sami-correct… They don’t really regurgitate as much as they hallucinate/bullshit. Which… Verbatim regurgitation would probably be preferable. Like, how many answers (however wrong or right) do you need? I would love an AI that didn’t bullshit and would just give a simple correct (or even consistently wrong) answer and isn’t going to change that based on how you ‘prompt engineer’ it. But that’s probably asking too much.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 hours ago

      CEOs have all sounded the same for years now. Add in LLM talking points regularly and they all sound like robots with a broken speech unit