Like, we all know they’re listening , but can we provide proof?

My friend was complaining about all the new super surveillance that will be government required in cars after 2027, and I said to him dude you have a stock android, you use every AI slop feature, you use a smart TV on your unsecured network, and uses x every day. They have everything they could possibly need on him. Oh and he posts questionable things to fb daily under his real name.

  • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    22 hours ago

    if he wants to make or receive a call, he’ll use his Bluetooth headset or earpiece.

    Oh boy he should not look up how insecure Bluetooth is then

    • kn33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Eh, it entirely depends on your threat model. If you’re trying to protect against mass surveillance, it makes sense because you’ll only sometimes have a functional microphone powered on. If you’re trying to protect against a targeted attack against you specifically, then yeah Bluetooth had some problems. You have bigger issues at that point, though. I also think Bluetooth is probably more secure than you think.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If you’re worried about the guy 10 m away from you eavesdropping, BT is not a great option. If you’re worried about the hackers on the other side of the planet, BT should be fine.