• Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I love it when “anti-capitalist” left glazes capitalist revolutions and their iconography (guillotines), as if toppling of aristocracy and replacing them by rule of capital hasn’t been the status quo for ~150 years at this point

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      The French revolution was not to install capitalism, it was for increased freedoms, republicanism, and liberal democracy. It was without a doubt a step in the right direction away from autocratic rule, that doesn’t mean it’s the end of the line journey for liberation hence why calls for continuing the class war are made. The guillotine is merely a symbol for that, besides everyone knows these days we advocate for the wood chipper.

      • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        No, it was a literal bourgeois revolution where, in an alliance with underclasses in a popular movement, the bourgeois class revolted against the upper classes of the time in an attempt to destroy feudal social relations and allow capitalism to grow more freely (which these relations harmed).

        The liberal freedoms were also, in practice, freedoms for the propertied and the wealthy. This meant no more legal privileges or barriers between people if they wanted to start a business or something (as long as you have enough wealth to actually do it), weakening of the state power meaning that the powers that be can’t just suddenly change taxes, grant monopoly or confiscate property without due process, etc…

        As I said, it was historically progressive but not anymore, and calling for guillotines is essentially calling for a replacement of capitalist rule by capitalist rule.

        • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          calling for guillotines is essentially calling for a replacement of capitalist rule by capitalist rule.

          That is ridiculous.

          Guillotines are a general calling for revolution against the ruling classes, it is not specifically calling the French revolution.

          • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Is it that ridiculous considering the nature of that revolution, and the fact that when it does get used, 99 times out of 100 it’s always some moralist-fueled class collaborationist liberal movement that targets specific “evil” bourgeois individuals (i.e. specific billionaires, elected officials, etc) and calls for their downfall/replacement in particular rather than the class society as a whole?

            I mean you can certainly use it in any way you want and there’s nothing stopping you, but for those who aren’t operating just on vibes and who know the historical class-context and the modern use of guillotines, it does have the larp connotation and sometimes can feel like a self-report.

            • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              It is ridiculous to think in 2026 that people are clamouring to perfectly recreate the French Revolution of the 1700s down to fighting for the same social cause despite them already living in the product of that revolution, and that the symbolism of the guillotine is reflection of their intent to do so.

              The guillotine is no less a class sentiment than eat the rich is.

              And I have to ask is your ‘proud Zionist’ thing a bit or a genuine belief?