• MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    At least for Bitcoin it made some level of sense.

    With AI?

    If it really gets that good that everyone needs to use it, I can just ask AI how to use AI like a pro.

    Or I can just tell AI to use AI for me (isn’t that what OpenClaw is?)

    • balian@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Author likely isn’t talking about generic chatbot use, but about agentic systems that are being pushed for automating everything to the point you don’t have to touch your keyboard or move cursors anymore.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah it takes 0 skill. People thinking they’re Paul Allen because they typed a prompt is humorous. Its often the types who have absolutely no clue how computers work that are obsessed with llm slop.

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Bitcoin makes sense when the government prints 40% more currency and inflates assets, like Covid.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If it really gets that good that everyone needs to use it, I can just ask AI how to use AI like a pro.

      As a pro who is forced to use AI, I did this a lot when I was learning how to use it.

      Or I can just tell AI to use AI for me

      Yep. Subagents are a very normal part of AI tools