i’ve just seen a comment in a post, in this very community, saying people trust signal because of missinformation (from what i could undertand).

if this is true, then i have a few questions:

-what menssaging app should i use for secure communications? i need an app that balances simplicity and security.

-how to explain it to my friends who use signal because i recomended?

-what this means for other apps in general?

  • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The thing if someone has memory access Signal doesn’t need to store anything, transiting data is now available. For example all of your contacts when doing contact discovery. It used to be a simple hash, something for which you could build a rainbow table in a few hours, at the worst. It’s lightly better now, but still.

    Don’t take it from me, take it from Moxie:

    https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/

    It also doesn’t really matter if the software itself can easily be tampered with in memory by the hypervisor. Like I said, they are putting a lot of trust in Intel SGX.

    And let’s not even get into the digital sovereignty issues, and financing of right wing billionaires. Yes, running on AWS is an issue. It’s multiple issues even.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      37 minutes ago

      I don’t take anything from someone I don’t trust that also explicitly doesn’t use warrant canaries because he says they don’t work in contradiction to every legal authority.

      It’s also an issue that they run the signal server on one single AWS region.

      It isn’t hard or even all that expensive to run on multiple regions.

    • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/

      Since the enclave attests to the software that’s running remotely, and since the remote server and OS have no visibility into the enclave, the service learns nothing about the contents of the client request. It’s almost as if the client is executing the query locally on the client device.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        … Providing you trust Intel SGX (and AWS for giving them access to actual SGX and not just emulating a compromised instruction set)

        • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Providing you trust Intel SGX (and AWS for giving them access to actual SGX and not just emulating a compromised instruction set)

          😃

          conspiracy begins…

          • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            53 minutes ago

            What conspiracy? CPU bugs aren’t a conspiracy, they are just a fact. Amazon’s involvement with American three letter agencies isn’t a conspiracy, it’s a fact.