return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1278
arrow-up1278external-linkCyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the UStechcrunch.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·12 hours ago Since disabling the vehicle remotely is kinda the express intention of this device Uhhh nope, there’s no reason for a remote connection.
minus-squareHertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoInterlocks are for people who have had a DUI, by your logic ankle monitors should not be able to be accessed remotely. Don’t break the law If you don’t want to be monitored by the state.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours ago Interlocks are for people who have had a DUI Yes I am actually aware, thanks. ankle monitors should not be able to be accessed remotely. Ankle monitors monitor location. Interlock devices monitor intoxication levels, and locally send a signal to the vehicle about whether it’s ok to drive. The difference should be obvious.
minus-squarePabloSexcrowbar@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoI can’t tell if you’re being serious or not.
Uhhh nope, there’s no reason for a remote connection.
Interlocks are for people who have had a DUI, by your logic ankle monitors should not be able to be accessed remotely.
Don’t break the law If you don’t want to be monitored by the state.
Yes I am actually aware, thanks.
Ankle monitors monitor location. Interlock devices monitor intoxication levels, and locally send a signal to the vehicle about whether it’s ok to drive. The difference should be obvious.
I can’t tell if you’re being serious or not.
Of course I am?