So you would prefer to live in a society without homelessness, but you wouldn’t say that it would be “good” to create a society without homelessness, is that right? Just trying to understand.
I don’t think it is subjective, but even if it is, I am asking you, what is your subjective opinion? Because to me, it feels like you are too cowardly to admit your true feelings, and you are hiding behind this semantic argument instead.
Edit: Silently downvoting this comment just proves my point. Thanks for the discussion.
I think it’s objectively efficient, but not objectively “good”
Wouldn’t you prefer to live in a society without homelessness, for example? You don’t think that would be a better society than our current one?
My disagreement was with the wording of “good”, that’s all.
So you would prefer to live in a society without homelessness, but you wouldn’t say that it would be “good” to create a society without homelessness, is that right? Just trying to understand.
Pretty sure someone else said it before, good is subjective. Look i get you wanna debate but there’s not enough meat on this bone
I don’t think it is subjective, but even if it is, I am asking you, what is your subjective opinion? Because to me, it feels like you are too cowardly to admit your true feelings, and you are hiding behind this semantic argument instead.
Edit: Silently downvoting this comment just proves my point. Thanks for the discussion.