not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agopaniclemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1571file-text
arrow-up1571imagepaniclemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square31fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-22 days agoAnyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds. That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoKids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoThat’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
minus-squareChakravanti@monero.townlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoPossession of money is literally the definition of scammed.
Anyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds.
That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
Kids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
That’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
Possession of money is literally the definition of scammed.