not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agopaniclemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1588file-text
arrow-up1588imagepaniclemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square30fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-22 months agoAnyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds. That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoKids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoThat’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
minus-squareChakravanti@monero.townlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoPossession of money is literally the definition of scammed.
Anyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds.
That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
Kids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
That’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
Possession of money is literally the definition of scammed.