cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44699253

This is clearly a sign that the product failed to draw in enough customers and its viability was overhyped.

Hopefully, it is the start of the AI bubble bursting.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s not and probably the opposite.

    When Sora launched it was way ahead. Seedance 2’s release was notably better than any of the other video gen models, Sora included.

    The market is getting commoditized because there’s no moat and OpenAI hasn’t led on pretty much any release for a while now other than Sora, which they’re probably falling behind on now.

    This is the opposite of a burst from a tech standpoint, even if OpenAI as a company starts to pop.

    TL;DR: This is likely happening because the tech accelerated across the industry in ways OpenAI can’t catch back up to, not because it’s lagging.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Isn’t spending billions of dollars with nothing to show for it in the end the definition of a popping bubble?

      • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No, it’s called the basic business model for tech companies since years. Sadly.

        A bubble popping would be when people start asking for their ROI or sell.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Upvoted for a different perspective, but I suspect it ends in the same place.

      OpenAI is kept solvent by investor capital, and capital is kept flowing by the perception of OpenAI being the market leader. Seedance being a better model, enough to cause OpenAI to exit the market, still ruptures the perception of value. In a market with no clear profitability path, that’s ground falling away.

      It also can’t be simply commoditized because generations (I’m sure even Seedance) are expensive and still not good enough for production use, even if 50% of their consumer base might boycott if a major studio even did use it in production. Commoditization can’t occur when there’s still no economically self-sustaining, market-acceptable “good enough” product. Without that, even if the leader changes, it’s a race between lemmings (sorry) off the cliff.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yep - they briefly led in video gen but quickly were overtaken by other groups. There are even open source local models that perform really well now.

      They could conceivably catch back up but how does that help them when their priority is chasing the AGI/ASI dragon?