cm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 4 days agoUK iPhone users face over-18 age check to use services after updatewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up164cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up164external-linkUK iPhone users face over-18 age check to use services after updatewww.theguardian.comcm0002@literature.cafe to Privacy@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareLytia @lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 days agoThere is, AFAIK, zero proof to back up your claim.
minus-squareIceFoxX@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agohttps://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2018/01/16/apple-and-the-fbi-are-closer-than-you-think/ https://appleinsider.com/articles/18/01/16/apple-educating-fbi-other-police-on-accessing-data-from-iphones-macs-icloud Lol…
minus-squareXLE@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoEven if true, I think I prefer when Apple was normalizing standing up to surveillance, instead of being the first to endorse it.
minus-squareLytia @lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 days agoYeah, I agree. I just wanted to call them out because FUD has never once helped the privacy community, and I’m tired of people strawmanning big tech and making the comm look bad.
There is, AFAIK, zero proof to back up your claim.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2018/01/16/apple-and-the-fbi-are-closer-than-you-think/ https://appleinsider.com/articles/18/01/16/apple-educating-fbi-other-police-on-accessing-data-from-iphones-macs-icloud
Lol…
Even if true, I think I prefer when Apple was normalizing standing up to surveillance, instead of being the first to endorse it.
Yeah, I agree. I just wanted to call them out because FUD has never once helped the privacy community, and I’m tired of people strawmanning big tech and making the comm look bad.