• 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I guess they have their own fork of it?

    Upstream hasn’t seen a new release, nor any commits, since 2015: https://lilo.joonet.de/

    Perhaps.
    Has lilo needed any changes, though?
    If it hasn’t, then no commits and no feature creep.

    • fruitcantfly@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Development stopped not because LILO didn’t need any changes, but because of its limitations (source):

      NOTE: I have finished development of LILO at December 2015 because of some limitations (e.g. with BTFS, GPT, RAID). If someone want to develop this nice software further, please let me know …

      Also, I dunno what your position is on this, but it is amusing to see calls for Canonical to replace GPL licensed software, with something with a more lenient license (BSD-3-clause). Normally that would cause outrage around here

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I recall something about LILO nor supporting RAID when i tried it a few years ago.

        but it is amusing to see calls for Canonical to replace GPL licensed software,

        Par for the course with Canonical™, much like all the rust rewrites.