• BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    “For the children” tech laws should all be abolished. Why should I be burdened because you can’t be bothered to raise your own damned kids properly?

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re right, because kids have been shown to listen to the parents all the time and have never had problems handling adult situations when their parents aren’t around 100% of the time. Even amazing parents raise kids who do stupid shit. And once these amazing parents aren’t around their kid 100% of the time, those kids are still kids and will make bad decisions. This is especially true when it is something that literally every person around them is doing (adults, kids, friends, celebrities).

      • bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        We all did dumb shit as kids, but tech wasnt anywhere near what it is now.

        These platforms need to be punished and held to account for the pervasive technology they have designed for profit, these things (FB, insta. Tiktok etc) shouldnt be able to exist in the first place in their current state. There were no guard rails put in place - just like the flood of AI, technology moves so much quicker than legislation can keep up and companys do really shitty things with that.

        I believe it starts at a parenting level, but it’s much more difficult to manage these days compared to 20 years ago. Age verification bullshit is not the answer but parents need to be given some form of help againt these fuckers and their incredibly easy to access addiction machines.

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I have a question. What if it’s not just at a parenting level. What if it’s also at a school in level? Because I think at least partially there is a disconnect between media and internet literacy and people of all ages including children and parents.

          I think we’re going to need such skills going forward and that there exist places in the world where students are being taught such things and are benefiting from them significantly.

          Yet the immediate knee jerk reactions seem to be blame the parents and blame the companies that facilitate the access to the content.

          It doesn’t have to be a parents by themselves against the world system. But it also can’t just be a “companies protecting the children” system because that’s not what companies do or are for? The need to maintain a profit margin flies directly in the face of the aim to hold companies responsible and the laws seem to be intent on capping the monetary consequences of a breach of the law.

          I do feel that the least a parent should be required to do before complaining to a governing body that they find someone else is “harming” their child is to show that they have done their due diligence to protect said child. We punish parents for willful negligence and child endangerment all the time. I don’t understand why this is different but I also wonder if there are other options for educating both children and adults that could help the situation significantly.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Kids should be banned from the platforms.

          But that requires the tools to do so. And then we are back at checking on ages and identities.