JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agoAV1’s open, royalty-free promise in question as Dolby sues Snapchat over codecarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1288cross-posted to: opensource@programming.dev
arrow-up1288external-linkAV1’s open, royalty-free promise in question as Dolby sues Snapchat over codecarstechnica.comJohnWorks@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: opensource@programming.dev
minus-squareberty@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoThe title is a bit misleading. What does that mean for the future of AV1?
minus-squareSasquatch@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·5 hours agoif Dolby wins, everyone implementing AV1 (or maybe just parties that profit from it?) will have to pay Dobly royalties, even though AV1 is royalty-free
The title is a bit misleading. What does that mean for the future of AV1?
if Dolby wins, everyone implementing AV1 (or maybe just parties that profit from it?) will have to pay Dobly royalties, even though AV1 is royalty-free
deleted by creator