• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 小时前

    Crypto bros are infamous for describing any criticism as FUD, no matter the criticism. It’s like a verbal tic. Here are some examples from the past couple days on the premiere Bitcoin social network:

    When all this FUD ends and Bitcoin goes 🚀

    Quantum FUD is at ATH

    FUD Busters [NFT]

    Flokicoin is built to last… Don’t follow the FUD.

    • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 小时前

      While I am aware that it’s a common crypto shill term, I think by this point crypto has fallen out of the mainstream, so their usage of terms doesn’t really matter.

      And as others have pointed out, the term FUD has been used at least since the birth of WWW/modern internet.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 小时前

        I have no argument there, the phrase was definitely not created by them, it’s just been beaten to death by them.

        They’ve also overused a bunch of ancient and unfunny memes well past their expiration dates, and universally adopted a collection of depressingly dull and incorrect slogans. “FUD” is just the one that has interesting meaning outside their sad sphere.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 小时前

          Expecting someone who doesn’t follow cryptobro spaces to associate the term FUD with cryptobros and therefore stop using it is… kinda ignorant.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 分钟前

            I agree with you, and hopefully my posts don’t come across like that’s what I believe. If anything, I’d prefer all phrases to be taken back from them.

            I’m just trying to describe the other half of where different people see the word, and why they might come to different, incomplete conclusions.