So the guy known for talking to anyone regardless of political orientation (left, right, fucking everyone) is a Nazi cos he talked to some people who you think are Nazis?
Let’s apply your logic:
You think the people Charlie spoke to where Nazis.
Because he spoke to them he is therefore a Nazi.
I’m defending Charlie kirk which by your claims makes me a Nazi.
Your having a conversations with me would thus make you a Nazi (by the same logic u used to define Charlie as a Nazi).
It seems logical consistency is not your strong suit.
Charlie Kirk was a white national selected to lead and build turning points usa, which most campuses hate because it’s a massive hate organization (ie white nationalist conservative apparatus).
He was known for debating and only showing the parts he was able to talk over the other person or when talking to those he agreed with.
I’m glad you’re finally admitting you are pro nazi
Yes he was one and defending him is defending a nazi.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/02/charlie-kirk-whiteness-turning-points-usa/
Please enlighten us
So the guy known for talking to anyone regardless of political orientation (left, right, fucking everyone) is a Nazi cos he talked to some people who you think are Nazis?
Let’s apply your logic:
It seems logical consistency is not your strong suit.
Charlie Kirk was a white national selected to lead and build turning points usa, which most campuses hate because it’s a massive hate organization (ie white nationalist conservative apparatus).
He was known for debating and only showing the parts he was able to talk over the other person or when talking to those he agreed with.
I’m glad you’re finally admitting you are pro nazi
U are yet to provide a single shred of evidence for this claim. You opinion is backed by nothing but an emotional reaction trained into you.
Again evidence?
I’m not I’m simply showing that ur logic when applied equally makes u a Nazi