kewwwi@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agodyklemmy.worldimagemessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up1717
arrow-up1717imagedyklemmy.worldkewwwi@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square143fedilink
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·13 hours agoBiology, legality and philosophy all disagree with your assertion that a dead body is equivalent to random inanimate objects. It’s human remains. A deceased individual. A corpse. You do not get to treat it on the same level as a shoe.
minus-squareminorkeys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoBiology and philosophy absolutely do not disagree. Some parts of philosophy, yes. Biologically they are a pile of complex organic matter that is unbinding.
Biology, legality and philosophy all disagree with your assertion that a dead body is equivalent to random inanimate objects.
It’s human remains. A deceased individual. A corpse. You do not get to treat it on the same level as a shoe.
Biology and philosophy absolutely do not disagree. Some parts of philosophy, yes. Biologically they are a pile of complex organic matter that is unbinding.