Continuing with your bad faith bullshit I see. Can’t really expect anything else from a neolib who can’t tell the difference between “1984 doublethink” and understanding that lesser evil is still fucking evil and thus not an acceptable compromise and will never affect progress towards the goal of liberating the working class from oppression by continuing to abdicate your political will in support of it.
Plenty of people have explained anarchist perspective and praxis to you across this site and it’s clear you just can’t comprehend it. I’m not gonna take on that challenge when others, who’re far better at explaining things than I, couldn’t even do it.
Continuing with your bad faith bullshit I see. Can’t really expect anything else from a neolib who can’t tell the difference between “1984 doublethink” and understanding that lesser evil is still fucking evil and thus not an acceptable compromise
Luckily, it would seem you think that the greater evil is an acceptable compromise. How fantastic. I’m sure the oppressed thank you all the time for your far-sighted, privileged stand in favor of your own mental masturbation over their wellbeing.
and will never affect progress towards the goal of liberating the working class from oppression by continuing to abdicate your political will in support of it.
“People aren’t wrong to miss less-horrific times.”
“How DARE you abdicate your political will in support of the lesser evil!”
…
Plenty of people have explained anarchist perspective to you across this site and it’s clear you just can’t comprehend it. I’m not gonna take on that challenge when others, who’re far better at explaining things than I, couldn’t even do it.
I understand anarchist perspectives just fine, in general. But this isn’t even a question like “Is harm reduction mandatory?” wherein I might actually get into a brawl with some anarchists over it; this is literally just “Are people wrong for missing less oppressive times?”
You’ve both asserted that the times were not less oppressive, and called it a lesser evil. I’m sorry that that isn’t unsubtle enough for you to trigger your own sense of cognitive dissonance, but I understand you have a lot of practice ignoring that particular annoyance in your head.
Continuing with your bad faith bullshit I see. Can’t really expect anything else from a neolib who can’t tell the difference between “1984 doublethink” and understanding that lesser evil is still fucking evil and thus not an acceptable compromise and will never affect progress towards the goal of liberating the working class from oppression by continuing to abdicate your political will in support of it.
Plenty of people have explained anarchist perspective and praxis to you across this site and it’s clear you just can’t comprehend it. I’m not gonna take on that challenge when others, who’re far better at explaining things than I, couldn’t even do it.
Luckily, it would seem you think that the greater evil is an acceptable compromise. How fantastic. I’m sure the oppressed thank you all the time for your far-sighted, privileged stand in favor of your own mental masturbation over their wellbeing.
“People aren’t wrong to miss less-horrific times.”
“How DARE you abdicate your political will in support of the lesser evil!”
…
I understand anarchist perspectives just fine, in general. But this isn’t even a question like “Is harm reduction mandatory?” wherein I might actually get into a brawl with some anarchists over it; this is literally just “Are people wrong for missing less oppressive times?”
You’ve both asserted that the times were not less oppressive, and called it a lesser evil. I’m sorry that that isn’t unsubtle enough for you to trigger your own sense of cognitive dissonance, but I understand you have a lot of practice ignoring that particular annoyance in your head.