no banana@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoLeft wing architecturemedia.piefed.worldimagemessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up11.32K
arrow-up11.32KimageLeft wing architecturemedia.piefed.worldno banana@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square153fedilink
minus-squareinsurrection@mstdn.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agothere is no society without people.
minus-squareDreamlandLividity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 months agoYes, nitpick on the exaggeration of all things. Extremely good faith argumentation. Because if one village or city or country is excluded from the genocide, that makes such a big difference. /s
minus-squareinsurrection@mstdn.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoyou ignored the only noun in the description. it’s not nitpicking.
minus-squareDreamlandLividity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt does not change anything about the fact your definition is so broad it can fit almost anything. So yes, it is nitpicking.
there is no society without people.
Yes, nitpick on the exaggeration of all things. Extremely good faith argumentation. Because if one village or city or country is excluded from the genocide, that makes such a big difference. /s
you ignored the only noun in the description. it’s not nitpicking.
It does not change anything about the fact your definition is so broad it can fit almost anything. So yes, it is nitpicking.