• ISO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anyone here old enough to remember the German (I think) site/blog that used to publish a lot of anti Novell/Suse content because of their ties with Microsoft?

    I can’t remember its name, and couldn’t find it with a search.

      • ISO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That was the end. I vaguely remember a site/blog which was active between the start [1][2] and that end. So it was more circa ~2007.

        That period was my first years of full-time GNU/Linux usage, and I only started serious coding years later. In my mind at the time, their content was correct to hate on Microsoft (I always hated it myself, including when they did the bullshit “New Microsoft” rebranding attempt much later). But the site/blog content, I felt, verged into the obsessive and conspiratorial. And I can’t help but wonder how their content aged, and what would my current self think of it.

  • entwine@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is kinda weak IMO. Here’s the “conflict of interest” they point out for Lennart Poettering:

    Co-founded Amutable seven months earlier. Amutable’s stated mission is “cryptographically verifiable integrity for Linux workloads.” Every new identity field in systemd strengthens the market case for commercial integrity tooling. Poettering made no disclosure of his commercial interest.

    So apparently his eyes turned to Looney Tunes dollar signs when he saw one new identity field? That’s ridicuolous, especially since he can add whatever he wants to systemd, whenever he wants.

    Another conflict they point out is that systemd has no community steering committee or voting structure. Everyone knows this, it’s not new, and it’s part of the reason why people dislike systemd. It’s also why the previous conflict doesn’t make sense.

    The rest of the article is a dump of random facts and timelines, likely designed to build credibility in the minds of people who are already pissed about the age verification thing, and are looking (uncritically) for anything to make them more pissed. Aka, this is ragebait more than anything substantial.

    The only part that I think is actually worth pointing out is that the person who merged the PR is a Microsoft employee, and Microsoft is one of the companies that has lobbied for age verification. Idk if that’s legally actionable, but it sure is useful context I didn’t have before (although I’m sure many people did know that)

    Edit: LMAO and I forgot, Devuan is an anti-systemd distro. That’s a conflict of interest they didn’t disclose in this article either