• magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    1000026004

    Imagine letting an entertainment product write your code for you. Why the fuck are you doing this if you don’t even like the act of programming?

    • username_1@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      No idea why people do that. I suppose some people are too dumb to write code and some other people are too dumb to understand what programmers use LLMs for. What dumb people do best? Attentionwhoring, screaming and throwing hysterical tantrums.

      • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        How do dumb people get dumber? By letting AI do their work and thinking they’re saving time, while in reality, proven by multiple studies, they are not. I would recommend you do some research and read the studies, but you will probably just go to your sycophant AI agent for the research.

        There’s basically no time saved, but people do get dumber because they’re not thinking critically themselves anymore.

        This dumbness and lack of critical thinking is very apparent in your case.

      • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I get writing boilerplate and unit tests can probably be done by software well enough, at least when supervised.

        Ill be honest, that’s not even my real issue.

        My real issue is that programming, devops, systems administration. All of these things are art forms, every bit of them. From high-level application architecture down to the tiniest details of implementation.

        Like how much of a library you choose to include, what you name your variables, what type of loops you use to iterate through data. How you choose to format and comment your code.

        Giving these choices to the machine is like the painter giving their brush to it.

        Just like images generated by stable diffusion will never be worth their fully-human painted equivalent. So too will LLM-developed programs fail to hold that value.

        For what its worth, this isnt new. I’ve held contempt for VC-worshipping developers who see programming as a means to an end far longer than LLMs have been used for serious work.