How can I possibly be doing it wrong when the page it’s citing mentions nothing of what it’s taking about, or when it tells me to do something that we as a company do not do?
I’ve been doing this shit for 20 years now.
Welcome to the club.
it’s an extremely useful tool
Sure, for writing letters but not for searching which is what I’m taking about.
Than you’re doing it wrong, I use it for similar things and find it far better than previous methods and I’ve been doing this shit for 20 years now.
There’s a reason why so many people are using it, it’s an extremely useful tool in some applications. It’s not perfect, but it saves a lot of time.
How can I possibly be doing it wrong when the page it’s citing mentions nothing of what it’s taking about, or when it tells me to do something that we as a company do not do?
Welcome to the club.
Sure, for writing letters but not for searching which is what I’m taking about.
Because I go to the fucking cited page, I don’t rely on the LLM to give me the answer. It’s not different to using Wikipedia.
Writing letters is the worst use for it, it’s not good for creative works.
You do not have access to a secret LLM that doesn’t introduce errors. You either don’t notice them or dismiss them.
They introduce errors, hence why I get it to give me to the page on the source material to verify it myself.
You could have just gone to the page without asking daddy Copilot how to do it 🤷♂️
And once again, we’re back to the issue of natural language search not being a feature of ctrl-f.