I mean yeah but if the automated way is a quick command under a minute and its going to be used for years then great.
This is kinda why programmer was not a good for for me. By the time I script something its because doing it again and again has just gotten so annoying I finally get off my but and do it.
So then you break even after using the automation to do the task 144 times.
Seems like a decent trade-off
I know it’s supposed to be a joke how a nerd will spend six hours writing a script to automate a 30second task but… it’s not really funny.
Working with less-experienced developers, I’m amazed at how slow everything is for them: No keyboard shortcuts, no automated scripts, just slow, plodding mouse-driven tinkering.
Automation, shortcuts, and scripting drive your ability to iterate and therefore learn.
Train your fingers, and spend those hours automating repetitive stuff. It’s worth it.
Sometimes the manual steps grow like weeds. Where I’m at now, they haven’t invested in automation much at all. Now deploys take all day. Making a code change is a sweaty manual regression search process. It’s bad.
it’s worse when everything is manual because they don’t “trust scripts” due to them not fully understanding what automation means.
deleted by creator
I swear we must have started posting at the same time, but adding an alt text to the image cost me 2 minutes apparently. xD
You should write a script to automate it
Having alt-text makes yours superior; I will, therefore, cede the content to you. :)
Why spend 10 minutes doing a task when you can automate it in 6 hours?
hey, the 24 hours i invested were totally worth it to save 30 minutes of work over a year!
