That’s very cool. Hopefully GNOME will steal this idea one day.

Hopefully, this includes a way too launch a new tab with a specified container using only the keyboard.

I swear, the stupid of these people must be contagious. It’s the only thing that explains how they’re not all laughed out of every gathering.

That won’t do in my case 'cause I need to share multiple windows throughout the session as I switch between my terminal/IDE/browser etc.

[I’ve now edited the initial question to reflect this]

The problem is that I need to switch workspaces rapidly as part of the share: terminal → browser → IDE → browser → IDE → terminal, etc. I can’t be constantly going back and toggling which window I’m sharing.

[I’ve now edited the initial question to reflect this]

That was a frustrating read. Dude gets screwed by Microsoft who effectively steals his code and rebrands it as theirs and then he goes on to talk about why he prefers MIT.

That’s understandable, though one of the other commenters suggested the LGPL which might make for a good fit for your case. Here’s a comparison with the other two if you’re interested.

The AGPL is just the GPL with extra rules requiring sharing the code even if you expose it exclusively via a service.

Ooh, yes for for this case, the LGPL would be a good middle-ground for OP’s concerns.

A simple comparison between the two via interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu says that they’re almost identical save for one clause around trademarks:

https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/licence/compare/BSD-3-Clause;MIT

But I’d be remiss if I didn’t advocate for a license that better protected your project from corporate theft. The AGPL and GPL are excellent licenses that protect your work and that of the community from companies that would copy it, improve it exclusively for themselves and then ship your work exclusively in binary form:

https://choosealicense.com/licenses/

The facts don’t care about the feelings of the electorate, let alone that of shareholders.

1. Carbon capture does not work. There’s no practical case for it, even if you throw the economics out.
2. Increasing renewable energy is not enough if we continue to increase our fossil burning.
3. Any economic or political case for fossils is necessarily short-term, because points 1 and 2 ensure that the long-term always ends in catastrophe and catastrophe is bad for the economy.

For those on Mastodon, the #CarryShitOlympics hashtag has some real gems in this style.

With all those forest fires clearing the way, now’s the time to build more climate shredding infrastructure!

I started using it 'cause I was working with a lot of Linux nerds and they convinced me to try it out. I liked the politics of the GPL and the potential in the Free ecosystem.

25 years later I refuse to use anything else. Windows & Mac are built to take options away from you, to force you do use your hardware their way, and I hate it. My machine does exactly what I want it to, with hundreds of keyboard shortcuts and a solid UI built atop transparent subsystems. Windows ties my hands while pushing ads and AI into my eyeballs. Mac only “Just Works” if you’re using it precisely the way that want you to and exclusively with other iShit. No thanks.

Thank you for this. It’s positively infuriating the way the left keeps eating itself. There is no way the establishment will let socialism take root in the Democratic party, but there’s real value in moving the Overton window to the left enough to allow people to see either the benefits of socialist policies or (more likely) the opposition to it.

The whole “fuck these guys, they’re not revolutionary enough” is a great way to ensure that nothing ever gets done.

We should absolutely have red lines though. Some of these candidates already cross them, and even more candidates may be all talk. But shitting all over anyone who dares to do anything other than launch an unpopular resistance is not constructive.

As this is your first go, I’d recommend not tinkering with USE flags at all. Take the defaults, find what you don’t like, and consider tweaks later. USE flags can end up like a sort of “dependency hell”, with one package not working correctly because it expects another package to have something you’ve excluded. It’s uncommon, but frustrating when it happens. It’s best to start with the defaults.

I suppose the most important thing to have post-apocalypse is a copy of Wikipedia.

You might want to look into Gemini (not Google’s “AI” offering, despite the name). It’s an internet protocol for sharing text-only communication. There’s a whole community out there working with it.

There’s something deeply infuriating about a politician citing climate change and energy security as priorities in the same breath as promoting LNG and carbon capture as solutions.

He either doesn’t understand the problem, or he’s hoping we don’t. Both options make him a terrible leader.

Edit: and now I’m at the point where he’s saying that the path to transition is through a period of increased emissions because the shock would be too great. Now where have I heard that before?

Oh right, the last 30 years. Somehow, choosing not to burn the planet is something “Future Canada” will have to do. “Present Canada” is always willing to screw over future generations if it means making fossil companies richer.

This is the typical defence for copyright. It’s also innacurate to the point of being intellectually dishonest. It ignores the reality of capitalism where legal protections only exist for people and corporations that have the money/power to get what they want.

Your Thing™ example would be cloned and sold on Amazon by a broad range of fly-by-night companies, and that’s if you’re lucky. If you’re unlucky, Amazon will clone it themselves, obfuscate your product in its search results, and sell your product under their brand, sometimes even for more than you’re selling it.

If your Thing™ isnt a physical product but rather something creative, then 99 times out of 100, there are only really two paths available to you:

In the lucky case you sell your copyright to a third party that exploits it (and you), offering you a pittance while simultaneously tying your hands, preventing you from creating derivative works or even just giving it away… for the res t of your life, and that of your kids’. In the unlucky case, you can’t afford to promote your product, so you toil for years with little to no reward for your work. Then AI techbros scrape your art and sell it back to you exclusively for their profit.

Copyright has some great marketing, but it offers you little while the rich claim ownership over your art, and our society.

Those rights are yours. They’re only denied to you because of copyright and capitalism.