Canadian software engineer living in Europe.

  • 10 Posts
  • 306 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • I started using it 'cause I was working with a lot of Linux nerds and they convinced me to try it out. I liked the politics of the GPL and the potential in the Free ecosystem.

    25 years later I refuse to use anything else. Windows & Mac are built to take options away from you, to force you do is your hardware their way, and I hate it. My machine does exactly what I want it to, with hundreds of keyboard shortcuts and a solid UI built atop transparent subsystems. Windows ties my hands while pushing ads and AI into my emails. Mac only “Just Works” if you’re using it precisely the way that wasnt you to and exclusively with other iShit. No thanks.


  • Thank you for this. It’s positively infuriating the way the left keeps eating itself. There is no way the establishment will let socialism take root in the Democratic party, but there’s real value in moving the Overton window to the left enough to allow people to see either the benefits of socialist policies or (more likely) the opposition to it.

    The whole “fuck these guys, they’re not revolutionary enough” is a great way to ensure that nothing ever gets done.

    We should absolutely have red lines though. Some of these candidates already cross them, and even more candidates may be all talk. But shitting all over anyone who dares to do anything other than launch an unpopular resistance is not constructive.





  • There’s something deeply infuriating about a politician citing climate change and energy security as priorities in the same breath as promoting LNG and carbon capture as solutions.

    He either doesn’t understand the problem, or he’s hoping we don’t. Both options make him a terrible leader.

    Edit: and now I’m at the point where he’s saying that the path to transition is through a period of increased emissions because the shock would be too great. Now where have I heard that before?

    Oh right, the last 30 years. Somehow, choosing not to burn the planet is something “Future Canada” will have to do. “Present Canada” is always willing to screw over future generations if it means making fossil companies richer.


  • This is the typical defence for copyright. It’s also innacurate to the point of being intellectually dishonest. It ignores the reality of capitalism where legal protections only exist for people and corporations that have the money/power to get what they want.

    Your Thing™ example would be cloned and sold on Amazon by a broad range of fly-by-night companies, and that’s if you’re lucky. If you’re unlucky, Amazon will clone it themselves, obfuscate your product in its search results, and sell your product under their brand, sometimes even for more than you’re selling it.

    If your Thing™ isnt a physical product but rather something creative, then 99 times out of 100, there are only really two paths available to you:

    In the lucky case you sell your copyright to a third party that exploits it (and you), offering you a pittance while simultaneously tying your hands, preventing you from creating derivative works or even just giving it away… for the res t of your life, and that of your kids’. In the unlucky case, you can’t afford to promote your product, so you toil for years with little to no reward for your work. Then AI techbros scrape your art and sell it back to you exclusively for their profit.

    Copyright has some great marketing, but it offers you little while the rich claim ownership over your art, and our society.