lumpenproletariat@quokk.auM to Memes of Production@quokk.auEnglish · 6 days agoliberal is not leftquokk.auimagemessage-square217fedilinkarrow-up1829
arrow-up1829imageliberal is not leftquokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.auM to Memes of Production@quokk.auEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square217fedilink
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days ago Sorry that you think calling out Israelis for genociding Palestinians is praise. Why should anyone believe you when all you do is carry water for people who sell them weapons?
minus-squarePugJesus@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days ago Why should anyone believe you Because genocide is bad, but I guess since I’m not one of your fellow bootlickers, you instinctively take the opposite position.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days ago Because genocide is bad So why do you carry water for its arms dealers?
minus-squarePugJesus@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoSo why did I tell people that voting for the less genocidal of the only two realistic candidates was necessary? Because I thought more support for genocide was a bad thing. Something you don’t agree with, I know.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days agoThe election is over and you’re still carrying water.
minus-squarePugJesus@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days ago“Carrying water” here meaning “Defending the choice of harm reduction.” I get it already, you don’t think that reducing harm is worthwhile. You don’t have to belabor the point.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days ago“carrying water” here meaning defending whatever any pro-genocide centrist does.
minus-squarePugJesus@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days ago “carrying water” here meaning defending whatever any pro-genocide centrist does. lol
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoYou’ve always found genocide hilarious, yes.
Why should anyone believe you when all you do is carry water for people who sell them weapons?
Because genocide is bad, but I guess since I’m not one of your fellow bootlickers, you instinctively take the opposite position.
So why do you carry water for its arms dealers?
So why did I tell people that voting for the less genocidal of the only two realistic candidates was necessary?
Because I thought more support for genocide was a bad thing. Something you don’t agree with, I know.
The election is over and you’re still carrying water.
“Carrying water” here meaning “Defending the choice of harm reduction.”
I get it already, you don’t think that reducing harm is worthwhile. You don’t have to belabor the point.
“carrying water” here meaning defending whatever any pro-genocide centrist does.
lol
You’ve always found genocide hilarious, yes.