That’s already good if it’s followed with the clause, ‘to escape poverty or an equivalent disadvantaged situation in a society.’
You don’t have to be wealthy, but all basic needs should be provided along with the means of finding employment that satiates a person. Granted, some people do still need intervention but not from a sterile or disconnected environment but from a community that is willing to engage with them.
That’s already good if it’s followed with the clause, ‘to escape poverty or an equivalent disadvantaged situation in a society.’
You don’t have to be wealthy, but all basic needs should be provided along with the means of finding employment that satiates a person. Granted, some people do still need intervention but not from a sterile or disconnected environment but from a community that is willing to engage with them.
No, because if one person is working for a salary that satiates them then it means other people must work for a salary.
No work.
No clocks.
No pants.