In the second case the publisher is upfront about it and you are told this is how it will work when you pay. The first case is basically fraud, where you’re paying for something on the assumption you’ll be able to keep it and then it gets destroyed.
In the end it boils down to which practice can be reasonably attacked on legal grounds, not necessarily how predatory it is.
In the second case the publisher is upfront about it and you are told this is how it will work when you pay. The first case is basically fraud, where you’re paying for something on the assumption you’ll be able to keep it and then it gets destroyed.
In the end it boils down to which practice can be reasonably attacked on legal grounds, not necessarily how predatory it is.
Fair point, I didn’t think of it from that view point.