• wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I was circumcized as an infant without my consent, and my mutilated dick wants you to stop downplaying the severity of its fate.

    A piece of me is literally missing, and you want to say I’m not mutilated because that would offend you? Why, do you have uncomfortable feelings about your own situation that you refuse to examine?

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Me not wanting to be labeled as mutilated doesn’t invalidate your identification as mutilated.

      If you consider yourself mutilated, then yes, you are mutilated. I am not mutilated because we see our personal experiences differently.

      • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yes but it shouldn’t be done to infants because they did not and cannot consent.

        You can’t know whether the infant will come to see it as mutilation. And it is irreversible.

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yes but it shouldn’t be done to infants because they did not and cannot consent.

          I have already expressed 100% support of banning non-medically necessary circumcisions.