• 1dalm@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The biggest problem with conspiracy theories like this is always the number of people involved keeping their mouths shut. Anyone that has ever managed a large project knows how impossible it is to keep a large group of people quiet about something. In real life, there are conspiracies. Often very large ones. But they didn’t stay secret for long.

    What is easier to believe: (1) that all these people involved, across countries with leaders of many different political varieties, all agreed to stick to a single narrative in order to cover up a deep international conspiracy to build a massive international database of people’s ages online, OR (2) Meta and other orgs are doing a normal business thing and trying to reduce their liability costs.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Counter-example: Epstein. But just continue to collect the checks for campaigning in favour of big brother Zuck, Thiel and their corporate and government friends. LoL

      • 1dalm@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t agree that Epstein is much of a counter point. There were lots of people taking about him, it really wasn’t that closely held of a secret, and he was arrested and prosecuted and murdered for it. Ultimately, with the files released, there really isn’t much in them that we didn’t already know.

    • WillowWhisper@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not everyone needs to be ‘in the know’, in fact most of the time people won’t even try to think through a position and it’s consequences. They’ll just support it based on surface level arguments. Also Meta isn’t exactly drowning in liability when they’re raking in billions in profit. Power stands to gain when information is controlled

      • 1dalm@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You really underestimate the trouble meta and YouTube are in. The specific rulings were barely tickets to them, but if they are upheld then follows flood gates of identical lawsuits are going to be opened up. They had millions and millions of child users in the 2010s that they knowingly served an addictive product to. If the current ruling is upheld, then there will likely be a very large class action settlement to payoff all the past injured users. But instead of changing their product going forward they want to get rid of the responsibility for their product entirely.

        Stop making up fake conspiracies and be mad about that.