Thunderbolt is Mozilla’s new self-hostable AI client designed for organizations seeking to run AI on their own infrastructure and maintain data in-house.
Facedeer, posting two contradictory things is not “having an opinon.” It is trolling.
You should try having an opinion, and even sticking to the topic (addressing Mozilla’s waste instead of bloviating about some vague virtue of the right to speech ). It would be so much more interesting.
What’s contradictory? A lot of people in that thread about AI capabilities were in denial. A lot of other people are making apocalyptic statements.
See that “other people” thing? Different people have different opinions and react differently. That’s the point I’m making here, too. Not everyone hates this AI tool that Mozilla has put out.
FaceDeer, don’t act dumb. You clearly went into both threads to attack and name-call anybody who doesn’t criticize AI under your ill-defined, ever-shifting standards. So your attacks ended up contradictory and hypocritical.
And now you’re here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)
And now you’re here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)
FauxLiving, harmburgler, Avid Amoeba, and CyberSeeker are discussing it in positive terms elsewhere in this very thread. 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 had a more cautiously open view. So yes, they are in the “room” with us right now.
Since you care about upvotes, note that many of my comments here have garnered a decent number of those too.
I ignored the first half of your statement because it was just pointless badmouthing of me.
I’m ignoring the rest of your comment because it’s a weird goalpost shift. Why would Mozilla ask a bunch of random people on the Fediverse what they want? You’re upset because they didn’t personally ask you what to do?
Facedeer, posting two contradictory things is not “having an opinon.” It is trolling.
You should try having an opinion, and even sticking to the topic (addressing Mozilla’s waste instead of bloviating about some vague virtue of the right to speech ). It would be so much more interesting.
What’s contradictory? A lot of people in that thread about AI capabilities were in denial. A lot of other people are making apocalyptic statements.
See that “other people” thing? Different people have different opinions and react differently. That’s the point I’m making here, too. Not everyone hates this AI tool that Mozilla has put out.
FaceDeer, don’t act dumb. You clearly went into both threads to attack and name-call anybody who doesn’t criticize AI under your ill-defined, ever-shifting standards. So your attacks ended up contradictory and hypocritical.
And now you’re here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)
FauxLiving, harmburgler, Avid Amoeba, and CyberSeeker are discussing it in positive terms elsewhere in this very thread. 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 had a more cautiously open view. So yes, they are in the “room” with us right now.
Since you care about upvotes, note that many of my comments here have garnered a decent number of those too.
You ignored the first half of my statement. Noted.
To the second half: show me where they asked Mozilla to spend money on it before Mozilla did. Otherwise you misinterpreted what I wrote.
I ignored the first half of your statement because it was just pointless badmouthing of me.
I’m ignoring the rest of your comment because it’s a weird goalpost shift. Why would Mozilla ask a bunch of random people on the Fediverse what they want? You’re upset because they didn’t personally ask you what to do?
You can’t name anyone who asked for this thing that Mozilla is burning money on? Noted.
Don’t be so quick to confidently name names, then. Including with the weird “karma” accusation you tried throwing at me.