The video I linked I shows the Intree robot running at 10 m/s…that’s a sub 3 minute mile. Anything so janky that there is a stretcher sitting by the starting line is either staged or generated. No company that is serious about the field is going to show themselves as being slthat far behind their competitors.
is either staged or generated. No company that is serious about the field is going to show themselves as being slthat far behind their competitors.
Have you even thought about the fact that this is most likely not the company releasing it, but rather a smartphone video made by some random bystander? It could also be a fairly old video of an early prototype - if I remember right, spaceX has once released a video with a bunch of rocket launch fails for the funsies. Or hell, maybe it’s a school project of some engineering students. Nobody really knows the context.
Your claim of that video being AI has nothing to do with the video, but simply “other companies are further than this lol” which is honestly a pretty stupid standpoint. You should analyze the video itself for any hints of being AI generated.
Who says this company has the same financial resources as that one?
Who says the video you shared is not significantly newer than the one OP shared?
Who says this is even a company made robot? This could be an engineering competition for all we know.
You called it AI based on a comparison with no logical basis behind why that would mean it’s AI, not based on any actual reason or tell within the video.
I can see several reasons why this is not an AI video within the video. The background is too consistent, trees and the fence stay in the same place. Things that go off camera come back on camera look the same as before.
Are you certain that there is a claim that the company responsible for the tripping robot put this out as a piece of publicity?
Because if not, if it was a leak, or taken by someone not affiliated, then it would make sense it’s on the internet.
Or, are you arguing that because there exists a robot which can run reliably at 10 m s-1, that this one shouldn’t exist?
Because my car goes 0-60 slower than a McMurtry Speirling, and yet it exists.
I’m suggesting that any company that has a robot that does this is in deep fucking trouble. They should pull an Allbirds and do an AI pump and dump because they are far behind the market.
The video I linked I shows the Intree robot running at 10 m/s…that’s a sub 3 minute mile. Anything so janky that there is a stretcher sitting by the starting line is either staged or generated. No company that is serious about the field is going to show themselves as being slthat far behind their competitors.
Have you even thought about the fact that this is most likely not the company releasing it, but rather a smartphone video made by some random bystander? It could also be a fairly old video of an early prototype - if I remember right, spaceX has once released a video with a bunch of rocket launch fails for the funsies. Or hell, maybe it’s a school project of some engineering students. Nobody really knows the context.
Your claim of that video being AI has nothing to do with the video, but simply “other companies are further than this lol” which is honestly a pretty stupid standpoint. You should analyze the video itself for any hints of being AI generated.
Who says this company has the same financial resources as that one?
Who says the video you shared is not significantly newer than the one OP shared?
Who says this is even a company made robot? This could be an engineering competition for all we know.
You called it AI based on a comparison with no logical basis behind why that would mean it’s AI, not based on any actual reason or tell within the video.
I can see several reasons why this is not an AI video within the video. The background is too consistent, trees and the fence stay in the same place. Things that go off camera come back on camera look the same as before.
That is so fucking dumb that I can’t even explain it, your comment that is. I felt my own brain cells imploding from just reading it.
What am I missing here?
Are you certain that there is a claim that the company responsible for the tripping robot put this out as a piece of publicity?
Because if not, if it was a leak, or taken by someone not affiliated, then it would make sense it’s on the internet.
Or, are you arguing that because there exists a robot which can run reliably at 10 m s-1, that this one shouldn’t exist?
Because my car goes 0-60 slower than a McMurtry Speirling, and yet it exists.
I’m suggesting that any company that has a robot that does this is in deep fucking trouble. They should pull an Allbirds and do an AI pump and dump because they are far behind the market.
Ah ok. In your first post you said “it has to be AI”, which made me think you were saying the video was fake.