• apparia@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There are three sections of bullet points, but the third is numbered for some reason.

    The third one is the footnotes. That’d be the reason.

    Personally I didn’t clock the article as slop; having footnotes in the first place is a credit towards that.

    • Harvey656@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’ll have to wait until I’m back home to give a proper reply, but the article reads really poorly.