• Jrockwar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    First of all, I’m going to say that I don’t think this comparison actually makes sense and I was just entertaining the question of the message I was replying to - humans are machines are way too different to reduce the comparison to merely “which is more energy efficient”.

    But second, I compared to the same level - I stopped at infrastructure. I didn’t consider the costs (energy or otherwise) of building a solar panel or power plants in the same way I didn’t consider the costs of a frying pan, a hob, or farms. Because if we do that, then any point we make about this needs to be a 500 page dissertation, not a Lemmy message.

    The good news is that data for how much material/energy is required for a solar panel is freely available, and also that a solar panel can be used for energy generation many more times than a cow.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      But second, I compared to the same level - I stopped at infrastructure. I didn’t consider the costs (energy or otherwise) of building a solar panel or power plants in the same way I didn’t consider the costs of a frying pan, a hob, or farms.

      Which also uncomparable because like i said, we can forage and cook(or eat it raw) with no modern tools or money required, robot can’t forage sunlight without modern tech. Like you said, it’s a silly comparison that doesn’t make sense at all, which is what i trying to point out.