Probably because that’s bullshit. I’ve seen the video, can understand how some people might think that happened, but it didn’t. I’m definitely not in his cult, if such a thing actually exists. I’ve never even watched a significant portion of any of his streams. The guy mumbles a bit too much for my tastes.
Then why was his immediate reaction not one of compassion but scorn calling her a “baby”?
Idk about you but, if my dog yelped my first instinct isn’t to fucking scold her, it is immediately wondering what made my dog yelp. The fact he didn’t react that way, shows he knew exactly what made her yelp.
Watch the clip again, you cannot in full honesty make this argument.
That’s not what I said either. It’s enough for me to point out that the “facts” as you present them aren’t uncontested. I trust rational folks to go look for themselves. Nothing you or I bicker about here would or should be relevant to what they find. I also note that there are probably tens of thousands of hours of Hassan streaming with that dog in the background, and if there were a single other incident indicating that Hassan routinely tortures it, his detractors would certainly have surfaced it by now.
What I will point out is that, were we to swallow this junk wholesale, a “lesser of two evils” comparison between Hassan and his establishment detractors would still put him miles ahead. Shock collars are awful, but not genocide levels of awful. The talking heads reading AIPAC scripts against Hassan are literally motivated by support for a genocidal regime. Re-litigating old and seriously disputed claims is distraction at best.
Thank you, that’s all I was asking. This isn’t dinner grand political debate. Like I already mentioned, 8 agree with Hassan on a great many things. But y’all gotta stop worshipping him like the second coming. He’s correct, doesn’t mean he’s perfect.
It’s a debatable point, unimportant to the greater discussion. Only trolls and dnc ball suckers bring it up. It’s equivalent to how magats fixate on Obama’s middle name.
The whole reason they bring it up all the time is to derail substantive conversation and embroil the community in “what color is the dress” debates instead of talking about genocide. Even “winning” the debate is a losing move because it embraces the distraction and won’t keep it from coming up again and again forever.
Hey, I’m willing to debate this topic, why did you metaphorically plug your ears and say “nuh uh I’m leaving” instead of answering my question about why you’re more concerned about this dog than about all the animals you have killed for you?
Probably because that’s bullshit. I’ve seen the video, can understand how some people might think that happened, but it didn’t. I’m definitely not in his cult, if such a thing actually exists. I’ve never even watched a significant portion of any of his streams. The guy mumbles a bit too much for my tastes.
Then why was his immediate reaction not one of compassion but scorn calling her a “baby”?
Idk about you but, if my dog yelped my first instinct isn’t to fucking scold her, it is immediately wondering what made my dog yelp. The fact he didn’t react that way, shows he knew exactly what made her yelp.
Watch the clip again, you cannot in full honesty make this argument.
Doesn’t matter what he said, the only actual evidence you dipshits have is video that clearly proves you wrong, he did nothing to that dog
I’m not interested in relitigating it here. It’s been discussed to death.
Not interested in thinking critically about I think is what you meant.
I meant what I said.
So you come in here and start arguing with me, then when I bring up a salient point, you metaphorically plug your ears and say “nu-uh, I’m leaving.”
Way to stand on your principles…
That’s not what I said either. It’s enough for me to point out that the “facts” as you present them aren’t uncontested. I trust rational folks to go look for themselves. Nothing you or I bicker about here would or should be relevant to what they find. I also note that there are probably tens of thousands of hours of Hassan streaming with that dog in the background, and if there were a single other incident indicating that Hassan routinely tortures it, his detractors would certainly have surfaced it by now.
What I will point out is that, were we to swallow this junk wholesale, a “lesser of two evils” comparison between Hassan and his establishment detractors would still put him miles ahead. Shock collars are awful, but not genocide levels of awful. The talking heads reading AIPAC scripts against Hassan are literally motivated by support for a genocidal regime. Re-litigating old and seriously disputed claims is distraction at best.
Ok, so you admit he likely shocked his dog?
Thank you, that’s all I was asking. This isn’t dinner grand political debate. Like I already mentioned, 8 agree with Hassan on a great many things. But y’all gotta stop worshipping him like the second coming. He’s correct, doesn’t mean he’s perfect.
Get a job
They didn’t say anything remotely like that, you fucking liar.
It’s a debatable point, unimportant to the greater discussion. Only trolls and dnc ball suckers bring it up. It’s equivalent to how magats fixate on Obama’s middle name.
Ok, so debate it. I’m hearing both of you saying absolutely zero about it
The whole reason they bring it up all the time is to derail substantive conversation and embroil the community in “what color is the dress” debates instead of talking about genocide. Even “winning” the debate is a losing move because it embraces the distraction and won’t keep it from coming up again and again forever.
Hey, I’m willing to debate this topic, why did you metaphorically plug your ears and say “nuh uh I’m leaving” instead of answering my question about why you’re more concerned about this dog than about all the animals you have killed for you?
Way to stand by your principles…