not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agosusjaylemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1362
arrow-up1362imagesusjaylemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareSalamanderwizard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-219 hours agoI always took the Bible as a lot of bullshit. I never really gave any thoughts to scholars picking it apart. That’s pretty cool to think about.
minus-squareGrail@multiverse.soulism.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours agoHere’s a fun fact: Some scholars believe Genesis 1 is a later addition than the rest of the story, because Judaism was originally polytheistic.
minus-squareEinskjaldi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoIt mentions Baal, in a way that’s more concerned than it needs to be.
minus-squareDeacon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agoCorrect, and fundamentally you don’t make laws to prohibit something nobody is doing. A few different gods had to get rationalized or syncretized in one way or another as I understand it. Not only Baal but that pesky Asherah and her complicated and inconvenient situationship with YHWH.
I always took the Bible as a lot of bullshit. I never really gave any thoughts to scholars picking it apart. That’s pretty cool to think about.
Here’s a fun fact: Some scholars believe Genesis 1 is a later addition than the rest of the story, because Judaism was originally polytheistic.
It mentions Baal, in a way that’s more concerned than it needs to be.
Correct, and fundamentally you don’t make laws to prohibit something nobody is doing.
A few different gods had to get rationalized or syncretized in one way or another as I understand it.
Not only Baal but that pesky Asherah and her complicated and inconvenient situationship with YHWH.